MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Erika L. Nicholson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Apr 1997 16:52:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
I think it's impractical for Board members to sign checks, they are simply
not as available as professional staff.  Of course, use your head -- the
person who keeps the books should not have check signing authority (no matter
how much you trust them!).
Is your staff very small?  If that's the case I can see that the Board would
have to take more of a physically active role rather than a conceptually
active one.

The ED is responsible (legally) but not LIABLE for the actions of the staff,
with complete oversight he/she should be at least ONE of the check signers.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2