Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 1996 17:46:46 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John "Imawiz" Arnold wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 8 May 1996, Henry Grunder wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. Saved me the job.
> >> According to Ken Heard:
> >> >
> >> > The Subject should be "Who's censoring whom?"
> >
> >Unfortunately he could not save you from looking like
> >an ass.
> >
> >R.B. Wilkins
> >
>
>..........................................................................
> > O-
>
> My, my, my R.B.
>
> Since the Museum world is related to education, I think it's appropriate to
> correct a mistake (it really is "whom"). Ken Heard's correction was to the
> point but wasn't rude. What's your point?
>
"If we had no faults of our own, we should not take so much pleasure in
noticing those in others" - Rochefoucauld
The funniest thing about this little exchange over "whom" is that my
(new to the Internet) mother-in-law was watching over my shoulder today,
as I attempted to demonstrate the dynamics of E-mail discussion groups.
I was just in the process of describing the type of knowledge and
contacts one could expect from these E-mails, when I happened to pop up
this great little exchange.
Actually, it was perfect, as it gave me the opportunity to give her an
example of "un-moderated" vs "moderated" lists.
(:?)>
Greg Stemm
"With tongue planted firmly in cheek"
|
|
|