MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Arthur Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 1996 15:44:55 GMT
Organization:
Philadelphia's Complete Internet Provider
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Craig, Michelle ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: For Amy in the smallest town in America, and any others who may be
: interested, the Post article you are referring to featured Peter Swales
: as the lead voice protesting the Library of Congress' proposed Freud
: exhibition.

Um... Let me get this straight... They are protesting a Freud exhibit
because Freud's theories are considered dated? Isn't that like protesting
a Leonardo da Vinci exhibit because his ideas of flight are now dated?
Even if Freud is considered completely wrong, he did play an important
role in the thought and history of psychology. What's so bad about a
Freud exhibit? Or do they have some specific complaint about something
being said *in* the exhibit?
                                                Many Serendipities,
                                                Arthur
                                                [log in to unmask]
        The Lifschitz Psychology Museum
        http://www.netaxs.com/people/aca3/LPM.HTM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2