Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 26 Feb 1996 09:34:40 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Art is conceived and developed by the creative- it seems that it is
warehoused by other types. There is no other museum as hide-bound and
static as an art museum. This is not a criticism, merely an
observation. What percentage of the population visits art museums? Is
it that art is only created for this minority. How can we make art more
accessible so that a greater percentage can (learn) to enjoy it? Perhaps
the art museum environment needs some tweaking.
On Mon, 26 Feb 1996, William H. Stirrat wrote:
> snip:
> >It sounds to me from your description that the artist created a
> >kinesthetic work and that the students merely experienced as it was meant
> >to be experienced.
>
> I dunno. From the way it was described, it sounded like blatant vandalism
> to me?! (For more on this topic, see David Haberstich's most recent
> posting about respect and responsibility, with which I firmly agree.)
>
> Sincerely,
> Bill
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> William H. Stirrat (Bill)
> Evaluator/Market Researcher ? !
> Our Minnesota Science Hall o
> Science Museum of Minnesota /( )\
> 30 East 10th Street /\
> St. Paul, MN 55101
> [log in to unmask]
>
> As always, opinions expressed are my own.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
|
|
|