Harry Needham writes:
>
>For information obtained from a WWW site, I would be inclined to do something
>like this:
>
>"Zapping Cavities", Canadian Museum of Dentistry,
>http://www.canmus.dent.ca/cavity.html, Jan.27, 1996
>

I recently completed a course on Internet and Education at the Masters level
in which we had to compose an "essay" on a particular aspect.  My
bibliographic citations looked like the one above, except the URL was linked
to the site.

The prof suggested that, where the site was cited in the body of the
"paper," the reference
 (i.e.,(Smith 1996:26-27)) should also be linked to the original site.

Elise Sherman
[log in to unmask]