MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Haberstich <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Mar 1996 19:19:15 EST
In-Reply-To:
note of 03/28/96 15:29
Comments:
Converted from OV/VM to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
 Hank, there may still be some confusion about USNM. "Smithsonian
Institution" was both parent and big brother to the U.S. National
Museum, in a sense. For example, for years the two units issued separate
annual reports. The Assistant Secretary of the Smithsonian functioned
essentially as Director of the United States National Museum. It would
have been conceivable for someone to be a biologist for either "the
Smithsonian Institution" (essentially a non-curatorial scientist) or
"the U.S. National Museum" (a curator of biology)--or both
simultaneously. The administrative history of the Smithsonian is very
confusing, made more so with each new building, each new Secretary, and
each reorganization. But I don't think it's any more complicated than
the history of many private companies, universities, etc. --David
Haberstich

ATOM RSS1 RSS2