On Tue, 13 Feb 1996, Stephen Nowlin wrote:
>
> I think there is a truism in exhibit design which holds that the more
> temporary, flexible, convenient, and portable a wall system tries to be,
> the less dignified it is as a background for the display of art.
>
>
Why does it matter that a background be "dignified"? What cultural
messages are you entangled with here? Do you want to be? If the choice
is between being approachable/informal or dignified, I would prefer the
former.
Richard Perry
UC San Diego
[log in to unmask]