This posting continues an inquiry posted in September 1995 on
materials testing.  At that time I inquired about the techniques being
used by subscribers for evaluating the suitability of materials for use in
exhibition and storage, how widely testing is performed, and the specific
criteria on which materials are being judged as suitable or unsuitable.  A
modest number of conservators and scientists responded to this inquiry
and expressed interest in beginning a dialog which might lead to a more
systematic and efficacious, and less ambiguous, approach to materials
testing.

As a next step, I am proposing the creation of a new listserv (tentatively
called materials-l) dedicated to discussion, research and development of
the techniques and applications of materials testing.  The listserv would
be open to conservators and scientists who test materials for use i
exhibition and storage, or research and develop new techniques for
materials testing.  Participants could reserve the right to restrict their
communication to the materials-l list (e.g., current research that is not
for wide public distribution); otherwise, discussion would be bundled and
distributed periodically by Walter via the Conservation DistList and
archived in CoOL.

I'd like to gain a sense of interest in the materials-l listserv before I
finalize its construction here at Williams College.  Please respond to me
directly by February 1.  Thanks.

James Martin
Director of Analytical Services and Research
Associate Conservator of Paintings
Williamstown Art Conservation Cente