Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
oddities
From:
"AUDREY B. DAVIS" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Nov 1995 09:00:53 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
What do people consider an oddity to exhibit in museums? So far bad
art, sex, body parts, shoes, tupperware, etc. have been singled out.
Why stop with any subject or piece? Isn't the purpose of the museum
to show the unusual, outstanding, attention getting, etc.? Is there a
connection between the oddness of the museum and the number of
visitors? Does the type of museum considered odd reflect the national
psyche which changes over time? Are there studies of what makes a
"good acceptable" museum in contrast to a museum of oddities?
Just a few questions in case anyone has reflected on the topic a bit
more than I have.
The fake or "come-on" type of museum is an exception
or should be singled out in a separate category since it is usually
set up to make a profit from gullible folks and is one of many
schemes to do this.
Audrey Davis
National Museum of Dentistry
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV