Posted to :     H-Net Military History Discussion List
                <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 08:41:54 EST
From: "Cronin, Clare C." <ccronin%ushmm.org>

>  The Enola Gay controversy reflects an ongoing
>        discussion in the museum community today, which is
>        the role museums can/should/would play as
>        educators.  Some believe that museums should
>        merely display collections and let audiences draw
>        their own conclusions, others believe that objects
>        must be interpreted.  Traditionally, museums are
>        not regarded as being "academic," and I would be
>        interested in hearing opinions on the
>        can/should/would question.

I've always thought that history and science museums should interpret the
exhibits they display.  Without interpretation, the gallery becomes a room
full of antiques (minerals, etc.) gathered in one place.  I can see how art
in museums can stand on their own, though it's always nice to learn about the
artists. Or historic homes and arboritums can be appreciated just by being
there.  But with the Air and Space Museum - just a gathering of old aircraft
without any explanation?  How DO others feel about this?

Deb Baroff, Museum of the Great Plains  Lawton  OK