Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Curatorial process and political pressure
From:
"Paul Apodaca." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Oct 1994 21:44:53 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>On Wed, 19 Oct 1994 Key Yellis wrote:
 
>Even if the exhibit were signed by the curator -- and I don't think NASM
>does that -- it is the MUSEUM, not the curator, that presents the exhibit,
>and the Smithsonian at that.  Surely that makes some kind of a
>difference.  Moreover, think of who goes there:  Almost everybody from
>just about everywhere.  None of us can make any assumptions whatever about
>what knowledge they bring with them, their ability to evaluate critically
>what they see and read and to put it into context, what the
>traditional viewpoint that is being revised even was, and so on.  At the
>risk of sounding like Jesse Helms, I'm not convinced the veterans groups
>were so very out of line.  After all, even if you put out a comment book
>in which I can register my anguish at what is exhibited and how it is
>interpreted, the exhibit is still up when I leave the building,
>essentially unchanged and with the weight of the Smithsonian's authority
>behind it.
 
A good point. Is the museum exhibition a thesis, developed by the curator,
and articulated with help from a professional team or is the exhibition an
institutional statement representative of those who govern, administer and
support the museum. The answer I was brought up with is the former. Does
that still hold up today? Are academic freedom and curatorial perogative a
legitimate concern of the museum or has the exhibit become so important as
an audience attraction and institutional image-definer that it is more
important to please than to present.
 
Paul Apodaca
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV