MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kerridwen Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Oct 1994 15:13:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I am doing some research on classifications used to document collections
of fine art, ethnological collections, and history collections.
 
I would like your opinions on the usefulness of the following:
 
Chenhall's Revised Nomenclature for Museum Cataloging : Do you find it
useful?  How do you feel about the fact that there is no current
commitment for updates to it? Is it used at all by fine arts people?
Or is it known or used outside the realm of history collections at all?
 
Canadian Parks Service Classification System for Historical Collections:
Have you heard of it/do you use it? Same questions as above for fine
arts.
 
Art & Architecture Thesaurus: How many of you working in museums are
using it in your documentation/cataloguing work?  Is it mainly fine/
decoratives arts people or also historians using it? What do you feel
are its strengths/weaknesses for the classification of museum objects?
 
These questions might give you an idea of the kind of information I am
looking for.  Any responses would be appreciated.
 
Thank you.
Kerridwen Harvey, [log in to unmask]
###

ATOM RSS1 RSS2