J. Trant wrote:
 
>I think this would be a great AAM session topic.  We need to look at what
>is effective and what isn't in the online environment, and more
>importantly, develop measures for success. What makes a good online site?
 
The CIDOC/MCN conference in August has a couple of sessions on this subject
planned and they include projects other than art museums where you might
find some insight.
 
>I would add the National Museum of American Art to the list, as they have
>been very successful [numerically] with their America Online presence.
 
But I'd heard that AOL wasn't particularly happy with the results in terms
of luring subscribers.
 
Robbin Murphy
Managing Editor, ArtNet
[log in to unmask]