MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Katherine Jones-Garmil <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jul 1994 16:49:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
On behalf of the Museum Computer Network, I would be willing to help with
this session or *quickly* include it in the sessions we are proposing for
AAM.
 
Thank.
 
Kathy Jones-Garmil
MCN Program Director
 
 
On Thu, 7 Jul 1994, J. Trant wrote:
 
> On Wed, 6 Jul 1994, Matthews, J wrote:
>
> > I am researching the cost/benefit arguments made by museums for mounting pub
li
> c
> > access point ssuch as a Freenet presence. Has enough time passed that Austra
li
> a,
> > BC, Cleveland, Dallas, et al have evaluated, justified or revised resource
> > implications/allocations?
> > Would this be a good case study for next AAM?
>
> Julia,
>
> I think this would be a great AAM session topic.  We need to look at what
> is effective and what isn't in the online environment, and more
> importantly, develop measures for success. What makes a good online site?
>
> Are you going to propose it?  I'd be willing to help.
>
> I would add the National Museum of American Art to the list, as they have
> been very successful [numerically] with their America Online presence.
>
> jennifer
>
> J. Trant
> Manager, Getty AHIP Imaging Initiative
> [log in to unmask]  AKA [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2