Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Disney
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 May 1994 17:31:47 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
>From the discussion so far,  it seems that most of the anti-Disney arguments
are not based on anything to do with the substance of what the Park will
portray, but rather on emotional reaction to increasing the density of land
use in the exurbs of the major U.S. population center (the Atlantic
corridor). Short of funneling massive support to ZPG, there is nothing one
can do to stop this -- I wonder how many of the respondants themselves live
in suburban developments, as opposed to high-density city apartment or row
house residential areas?  The Haymarket area will inevitably go the way of
all the rest of what used to be rural Northern Virginia, and whether it gets
massive housing developments and shopping centers or a theme park makes
little difference to the environment. As far as documenting archaeological
sites, that's a matter of enforcing Virginia law and putting unrelenting
pressure on local authorities to see that the law is enforced.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV