MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Moses <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:27:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Primary Research Group has published The Survey of Institutional Digital Repositories, 2011 Edition, ISBN 157440-161-0.   
The 225-page report looks closely at how 60+ academic and special libraries and other select institutions in the United States, the UK, continental Europe, Canada, China, India,  Australia and other countries or regions are funding, managing, cataloging, marketing and developing their institutional digital repositories. The report provides detailed data on budget and spending, sources of revenue and support, man hours deployed, range of materials maintained, number and source of visitors and downloads, and other key facts about institutional digital repositories.  

The report also looks closely at the degree of faculty cooperation, methods of procuring and measuring this cooperation, plans to develop repositories as publishers in their own right, impact on the online presence of the college and on citation rates in journals, among other issues. Data is broken out by size, geographic region, Carnegie class, years in operation and type of library or other institution (such as scientific institutes). 

Just a few of the study’s many findings are that: 

•	The repositories in the sample received a mean number of 375,919 unique visitors in the past year with a median of 33,210.  

•	52.4% of the survey participants housed books written by faculty or staff in their digital repositories.  This was most common in Europe (nearly 77%) and least common in the developing world (12.5%).  

•	Nearly 58% archived digital images, a practice most common in the USA, especially among research universities.  

•	For the sample as a whole, 4.45% of repository downloads come from Canada.  

•	Close to 33% of the survey takers have an interface that allows authors and other some other contributors to track their downloads.  

•	A mean of 32.3% of visitors to the repositories are from the repository’s own institution; the median figure was 12.75%.

•	39% of survey participants had a brochure for their digital repository; half of all European repositories had a brochure.

•	15.79% of repositories have an E-publishing program through which they publish monographs or books in either a print or digital format that might not have been initially published elsewhere.


For further information view our website at www.PrimaryResearch.com.	

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2