MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Sarah M. Allen Sarah Allen Museum Technician Knife River Indian Villages NHS Stanton, ND 58571-0009 701.745.3300" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:16:15 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (132 lines)
First off, try an osteologist. You would be surprised how easy it is for
one to identify even bone fragments as human or not. Secondly, NAGPRA
protects human remains from invasive testing without permission from the
affiliated tribe. I realize in this case you have a catch 22, but you do
not want to tread into that water.

NAGPRA does recognize it may be impossible to identify the tribe that is
associated with remains. This is the law governing the disposition of
culturally unidentifiable remains
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-5283.htm In the end, it may be
easier to err on the side of caution and if it is human bone, follow
NAGPRA. I have been to many reburial ceremonies involving remains as small
as a toe bone or a tooth that was simply found in the area of the ancestral
home of a tribe.

NAGPRA can offer you grants to defer the costs involved
http://www.nps.gov/history/nagpra/GRANTS/INDEX.HTM

It is in the end about respect, and many see invasive testing as not
respectful.

Sarah



                                                                           
             Thomas W Kavanagh                                             
             <Thomas.Kavanagh@                                             
             SHU.EDU>                                                   To 
             Sent by: Museum           [log in to unmask]        
             discussion list                                            cc 
             <[log in to unmask]                                             
             SE.LSOFT.COM>                                         Subject 
                                       [MUSEUM-L] Genetic Testing of       
                                       Archaeological Specimens for NAGPRA 
             04/14/2010 01:54          relevance                           
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             Museum discussion                                             
                   list                                                    
             <[log in to unmask]                                             
               SE.LSOFT.COM>                                               
                                                                           
                                                                           




Listeros:





Does anyone here have experience with the above topic?





Our museum has a small number (<50) of bones, which may or may not be
human, recovered by collectors and relic hunters over the past 80+ years
and donated to the SHU museum along with their arrow heads and axes.
Essentially, they are "Culturally Unidentified Human Remains" (CUHR). We
have submitted an inventory of them to the National Park Service (NPS) and
they are included on their on-line data base





For many we have no provenience data at all. For some we have a state and
county, and for a few we have a site name (e.g., a farm in the 1930s).
Recent proposed changes by the NPS in the regulations on how it museums
should deal with such CUHR will require that we contact the descendants of
tribes who lived in the areas of discovery. However, except in a few
obvious cases (a dog skull), in most cases we are not even sure that the
bones are human, let alone Native.





We have considered the possibility of genetic testing to seek evidence of
Native haplotypes/haplogroups.





Any thoughts?





Thomas Kavanagh, PhD


Seton Hall University Museum








========================================================= Important
Subscriber Information:


The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail
message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should
read "help" (without the quotes).


If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2