Whew!!  Talk about turning tables. Why should this guy be ostracized? 
Advocates of rationality have always been asking questions like: "Then 
how do you explain Dinosaurs?" "How can you refute Darwin?" "How do you 
explain this, then...."   Well, this essay was merely an explanation of 
a theory, a discussion addressing the seeming contradictions. Why should 
it be a threat to his scientist peers? I would think scientists 
frustrated by fundamentalist rhetoric would be glad to have, for once, a 
peer putting some critical thinking into an emotionally driven subject. 
Especially since "we" have historically been throwing up our hands and 
rolling our eyes, wondering aloud why science should be such a threat to 
fundamentalists.

Kim Steffgen
Freelance Writer
Portland, OR

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).