MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shawn Weisser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:35:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
David,

When I wrote that flash photography was a no-no,
i meant for patrons, not a single exposure in a controlled environment. I suppose that I was unclear. We have taken a digital photo of our art, but not under the best circumstances. Those items will have to be done over. The smaller, scanable items were what I was refering to. I plan to scan our collection for the Maine Memory Network and want to burn CDs so the objects will not be handled more than necessary. I was concerned about scanning exposure and what limitations should be set in place for the objects.
Since this is your field, I will take your word. However, before I can implement policy on these, I need a written source. So, if you could recommend a few, I would appreciate it.

Shawn M. Weisser

"David E. Haberstich" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Shawn,
>
>Yes, there are good reasons to forbid repeated exposure to flash photography
>in an exhibit or gallery setting.  You don't want 1000 visitors per day
>popping flashes at the same objects.  Also, in the days of flashbulbs, there
>was always the risk that a flashbulb might explode, showering glass shards.
>This is certainly a good rule for museum visitors.  But you asked about the
>staff photographing and/or scanning collection objects, presumably in a
>controlled setting, and that's the difference.  A single, 1/1000 of a second
>blast from an electronic flash is definitely safer than ten minutes under hot
>floodlights, and many museum photographers, on the advice of conservators,
>have been doing it that way for decades.  Although I'm not a conservator
>myself, I'm a photographic historian and have done a lot of flash photography
>with 19th-century photographs, so I have some knowledge in this area.
>
>I can try to find a supporting reference for you if you still don't believe
>me, but it will have to wait a day or two.
>
>David Haberstich
>
>=========================================================
>Important Subscriber Information:
>
>The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
>
>If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2