Somehow sponsorship is less bothersome than censorship.

>===== Original Message From Museum discussion list
<[log in to unmask]> =====
>Here we go again.
>
>This leads me to ask the question just why so many subscribers justify
>exhibits like "Sensations" which was a self serving commercial
>promotion by the owner of the art while at the same time decry what is
>happening at the Smithsonian where commercial donations are being used
>to finance buildings and exhibitions that have self serving commercial
>aspects?  Hypocrisy, or just politics?
>
>John Bing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 17:49:33 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>This article from NYTimes.com
>>has been sent to you by [log in to unmask]
>>
>>I'd like to know what your thoughts on this are.  Things like taking money
away from museums, compelling them to take down suggested donation signs, etc.
>>
>
>ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
>Important Subscriber Information:
>
>The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/
.
You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a
one
line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message
should read "help" (without the quotes).
>
>If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the qu

========================================================Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).