Hi Anne,

The "brutal snipping," as you've dubbed it, takes two short phrases
completely out of context.

Terri's implication (intentional or not) is that learning disabilities
do not exist; rather, teaching methods are successful or unsuccessful.
My point -- rather clearly stated, I believe -- is that learning
disabilities are real, and that sometimes teaching method matters squat
if the ability or interest of the student (or visitor in our case) is
impaired.  Clearly, these two positions are not representative of "the
same wavelength."

So, this would seem to be a case of either miscommunication or
miscomprehension?

Sincerely,

Jay Heuman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> Behalf Of Anne Lane
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 5:17 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Terri & Learning Disabilities
>
> >Jay, I think that Terri's phrase -
> > > the more we learn about what triggers a visitor's
> > > involvment,
>
> Is indeed recognition that
> >        people learn better in one way than another.
>
> Forgive the brutal snipping, but I think you two are really
> on the same wavelength.

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).