Museum labeling is a bit of a pet-peeve of mine. I fully recognize that the
general public generally prefers concise labels with only the most
significant information, however as a perpetual student, I often find myself
craving MORE!!!

I have developed some technical ways around this problem but remain
interested in knowing your opinions on the subject. (I perhaps should state
that I am familiar with published opinions on the subject.)

At the TAM/KAM (TN Assoc. of Museums and the KY Assoc. of Museums)
conference last week, Sharilyn Reec
of the NEA suggested using several labels with different voices to appeal to
different audiences (e.g. a label from a curator, one from a child and one
from a "typical" visitor). For those of you who create and design museum
text for labels and exhibits, what do you think of the "tripartite" label?

Just curious.

Laura Petznick, Ph.D.
\

______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).