ICOM-L Archives

International Council of Museums Discussion List

ICOM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Herreman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
International Council of Museums Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:14:28 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Dear Michael, Gary; Berenice; et al:

I a have been following the interesting discussions on the definition of
"museum". Unfortunatly it seems it has been reduced to a few
participants and all of them English speaking.
I am a bit surprised that our collegues from ICOFOM have not
participated...
Anyway, I would like to share with you my own points of view. I agree
with Gary, Michael and Geoffrey in relation to looking into a much more
profound, deeper and overwrapping view of museums. It seems to me we are
only rephrasing the traditional defintion of a museum.
I congratulate Berenice because of her very objective, clear and precise
approach. I would, appreciate though,a a more universal view. A real
breakthroeugh that agrees with the formal and operating innovations in
museums that are actually taking place.
In an other mail I will transalate the definitions garthered by Gary.
Hopefully hey will be reacted upon.

Yani Herreman
Vice President
Executive Council.


-----Original Message-----
From: International Council of Museums Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Cooper
Sent: Lunes, 10 de Noviembre de 2003 11:45 a.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Museum definition 11/6/2003


> For my understanding, are we continuing to view museums as in outward
> projecting institutions that deal with traditional approaches to
> objects, or should the definition give emphasis to enhancing the
> multicultural and social diversity role of museums? Does the idea of
> "public benefit" adequately describe this role, or is "public benefit"

> just a politically or
> socially correct expression that is open to interpretation
> and may require a
> second definition?


Surely the reverse is true? "Public benefit" is a generalisation that
surely cannot go out of fashion? It is "Multiculturalism" and "social
inclusion" that are the current politically-correct buzzwords. The
"public" are the public irrespective of social or cultural status.

Mick

Michael P. Cooper
Nottingham Museums Registrar
T: +44 (0)115 915 3671
F: +44 (0)115 915 3601

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the archives
at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2