ICOM-L Archives

International Council of Museums Discussion List

ICOM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cornelia Weber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
International Council of Museums Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:07:39 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (134 lines)
Putting University Collections to Work in Research and Teaching
UMAC’s 9th International Conference
10th -13th September 2009, Berkeley, California

University museums and collections occupy a critical nexus within the
university, serving as they do all of the university’s primary missions
of research, teaching and public service, which correspond roughly to
the user groups of students, faculty and non-academics. Having devoted
the 8th International UMAC conference to the public face of university
collections, we turn this year to consider their relationships to and
roles in research and teaching.

According to the 1952 Polski Slownik Archiwalny – the Polish Archival
Dictionary – the archive is:
“… an institution called upon to guard, collect, sort, preserve, keep
and render accessible documents, which, although they are no longer
useful on a daily basis as before, nonetheless merit being preserved.”

It is worth considering the relevance of this definition to the status
of university museums and collections. The archival role of public
museums, their responsibilities to preserve the material heritage they
contain, seems clear enough. In the case of university museums and
collections, however, the description of being “no longer useful on a
daily basis as before” is seldom accurate. Very frequently, the objects
held in academic collections are still quite actively used in research
and in the classroom. The dividing lines among the accumulation of
objects in individual faculty laboratories, departmental teaching
collections and fully-fledged university museums are blurry. Indeed,
university museums are full of objects, specimens and artifacts that
entered the university in the course of faculty research and teaching
activities. In justifying the relevance (and in some cases even the
continued existence) of university collections, their ongoing utility in
relation to the teaching and research missions can be paramount.

We particularly welcome presentations from the full range of university
collections: universities are very different from public museums in
containing research materials that may be lodged in formal museums,
departments, and individual faculty labs and offices, and that span the
full disciplinary range of the university. This multiplicity of
collections, and the slippage among them, has created challenges and
opportunities that may be analyzed and even celebrated as part of the
unique culture and history of university museums. How do collections
respond to changes in their user communities, to conflicting demands by
different user groups, or to changing research technologies? Collections
of historical scientific instruments are good examples of artifacts that
have shifted from being research tools (in the sciences) to objects of
research themselves (in the humanities). How might these sorts of
transformations be encouraged? What are some examples of renewed
scholarly or scientific activity that have resulted from either new
museum initiatives? How can preservation as a primary mission be
balanced with active research and providing classroom access? We
encourage papers that give an historical perspective to these questions,
papers that address instances of current programs, difficulties and
successes, and papers that suggest new models for developing the
research and teaching potential of museum collections for diverse user
communities.

- Where are university collections and museums placed within the
administrative structure of the university? Are they allied to one
particular department or discipline, or are they freestanding in their
research affiliations? How has administrative placement affected
research uses, demands by different user groups, and other functions of
the museum? How can collections make themselves more visible to new
scholars and students so that they can maximize their research potential?

- All disciplines change over time, asking new questions, employing new
methods and exploring new objects. Inevitably this means that the
relationships of material collections to their disciplines also shift.
How have these changes affected the research potential of collections?
One dramatic instance in recent decades has been the emergence of
increasingly sophisticated forms of DNA analysis, which have changed not
only the nature of cladistics but also transformed the relevance and
viability of natural history collections.

- Interdisciplinary and multi-disciplinary collaborations are now at the
forefront of most research, even in the humanities. How have such
collaborative research programs affected the use of collections?

- How are collections used for teaching? Are there accessibility issues
that must be solved? In particular, how are they made available to
undergraduates for research as well as teaching or display purposes? Are
there instances where public or community groups become involved in the
teaching or research functions of the museum? How can university museums
and collections best convey the findings of current research to students
and the general public? Can and should the research mission of a museum
be integrated into its public mission?

Further information will be provided on UMAC’s Website:
http://publicus.culture.hu-berlin.de/umac/2009/

Call for Papers

UMAC is currently inviting submissions for oral and poster papers
focusing on the Conference’s theme Putting University Collections to
Work in Research and Teaching.

Papers may be presented in three forms:
a) 15 minute formal talks
b) 10 minute informal ‘experiences’
c) posters

Authors of papers will be asked to participate in a discussion session
following the presentation. The language of the conference will be English.

If you would like to offer a paper, please send an abstract (in English)
to: Mark Meadow, Chair of the 2009 Review Committee,
[log in to unmask], or Cornelia Weber, UMAC Chair,
[log in to unmask] Abstracts will be accepted electronically until
March 31, 2009. If you wish to present a paper please supply us with the
following information:
- Title of submitted paper
- Type of paper: 15 minutes, 10 minutes or poster
- Name(s) of Author(s)
- Affiliation(s) & full address(es)
- Email, phone & fax of corresponding author
- Abstract in English (not to exceed 300 words)
- Support equipment required

All submissions will be considered by the Review Committee who will
assess each abstract for relevance to the theme and clarity of ideas and
expression.

Authors of papers accepted will be asked to give UMAC the right to
publish the paper on UMAC’s Website and in the conference proceedings
University Museums and Collections 3/2010 (see:
http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/umacj/). All presenters must supply a digital
copy of their paper on arrival in Berkeley and before their paper is
presented.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2