ICOM-L Archives

International Council of Museums Discussion List

ICOM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"R. Stulemeijer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
International Council of Museums Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:28:31 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (251 lines)
Dear ICOM Members,

The Youth Group discussion I have found to be very interesting.
I would like to offer a suggestion;
Make the term Young Professionals into Young Museum Professionals. This 
would not infringe on any age sensitive issues ;-)
Someone who joins the Museum Profession at a later age is still a Young 
Museum Professional (YMP). Maybe, membership to the YMP group can be 
limited, to 5 years or so. This way the YMP group doesn't become too grey 
and it will, hopefully, be a great resource of fresh ideas for ICOM.
Just a thought,
Roeland

Roeland Stulemeijer
Art Care
Conservation and Collection Specialist
[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Naomi Grattan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Youth Groups etc


> Hello!
>
> I have been reading this discussion with much interest, for three reasons.
> First, I am one of those 'young professionals' -- I'm 28 and work for the
> Cdn Museums Association as editor of our publication MUSE and am 
> responsible
> for much of our communications. Second, it seemed to me (though apologies 
> if
> I'm wrong on this) that there weren't any of 'us' involved in this
> discussion. And third, there are a number of 'us' in our offices, and we
> have been discussing getting some sort of young professionals committee up
> and running for Canada. A lot of our initial discussion has centred around
> the issue of defining what qualifies as a 'young professional' and we
> struggled with all the same issues that have come up here.
>
> Our conclusion was that 'young professional'  was a good place to start 
> (and
> Claudia Polley nicely clarified the distinction between this and student 
> in
> her post). However, in the end, we felt it was better to move to 'new
> professionals' to include those coming into the field who have many of the
> same issues that us 'young professionals' face. We also felt that it 
> wasn't
> constructive to bother with defining an age range.
>
> Just thought you'd be interested to know how a group of 'us' feels about
> this in Canada. So what next? How do we move this forward?
>
> Naomi
>
>
>
> Naomi Grattan
> Director of Communications/Directrice des communications
> Canadian Museums Association/Association des musees canadiens
> Tel./Tel.: (613) 567-0099 x223; Fax/Telec.: (613) 233-5438
> 400-280 rue Metcalfe St., Ottawa ON, K2P 1R7
> [log in to unmask]
> www.museums.ca
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: International Council of Museums Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Claudia Polley
> Sent: August 10, 2005 9:19 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Youth Groups etc
>
>
>
> All,
>
> So many good ideas are voiced here it's daunting to add anything. 
> However,
> I think a critical clarification should be made.  In Mario's  initial 
> email
> he
> refers to young people as "youth", which then was  re-interpreted by 
> several
> respondents as "students".  And then a couple of  wiser heads used the 
> term
> "young professionals".  I believe we must have  some good definition of 
> this
> group we all know ICOM is leaving out of its  communications and activity
> loop.
> To my way of thinking "young  professionals" is the intent if not the 
> exact
> description necessary.
>
> Perhaps wiser heads with a greater grasp of language could assist  here. 
> We
> are not talking about student involvement for the most part  here...that 
> is
> already addressed by many national committees whether well done  or not. 
> We
> need to act to have our younger colleagues become excited and  involved in
> this
> organization that purports to serve the world.  As Per  Rekdal says, those
> active in ICOM are greying a bit (if not a lot like myself),  and our 
> future
> depends on those who will actively shape this organization for  today and
> the
> future...not the past.
>
> So, let's get on with it.  The technology exists where we all talk to  one
> another via Skype and other internet-based communications.  Visual and
> audio
> links are easy to be had.  And information is the key here, as Ms. 
> Cockett
> so
> rightfully points out.  Even some of us elders want more direct 
> information
> and involvement.  Why not find a way to make it so?
>
> It's time.
>
> Claudia Polley
> Arts Associates LLC
> Washington DC & Caino, Italy
>
>
> In a message dated 8/10/2005 9:04:34 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've only recently joined this list, I joined ICOM/ICOM-UK  last year and
> have some thoughts regarding this issue. I feel the main  issues (for me 
> at
> least) has been around poor communication/marketing of  ICOM itself and 
> its
> events. I haven't been to any ICOM events even though I  am an active 
> member
> of a number of UK-based museums organisations, and my  workplace will
> support national travel to events (though rarely  international).
>
> I joined two committees when I signed up to ICOM but  no-one has ever
> communicated to me what I need to do to be active on  them.
>
> I think that the ICOM magazines are visually quite dull, mainly  black and
> white (maybe with a single colour), the ICOM news has an  incredibly small
> typeface making it difficult to read (I have no visual  impairment). There
> are no other mailings or extra information included with  them. They do 
> not
> make me want to read them.
>
> I just looked through  my last ICOM-UK magazine and there is nothing about
> up-and-coming events.  Details of the meetings listed in ICOM news are 
> very
> brief, just the  title/theme but no further information - obviously we can
> email to find out  but the communication is bad as nothing grabs you and
> makes you think 'oh,  that sounds interesting' etc.
>
> The websites of ICOM and ICOM-UK are not  up to the visual quality or
> intuitive accessible structure of other  organisations - the new ICOM
> website does look like it might be a very  significant improvement 
> visually
> and structurally this may help. The events  page of ICOM-UK currently 
> lists
> events from 2003, the calendar page of ICOM  does not make it immediately
> clear what each event.
>
> I use the  websites/magazines of a number of Museum organisations 
> regularly
> to find  out all sorts of information. I think the main issue is that when
> compared  to other organisations (in the UK - Museums Association,  Museum
> Documentation Association,  Regional MLA's etc...) ICOM simply  does not
> compete well in the fields of communication or marketing.  I  always seem 
> to
> know, with minimal effort what the UK organisations are up  to (via 
> emails,
> websites, publications sent to me at home, and to my  workplace) and I 
> have
> gone to meetings, taken part in panels/committees  etc. I feel I learn 
> more
> about what is going on internationally in museums  from UK Museums
> publications and UK newspapers.
>
> I also wonder about  your definition of 'youth' as under 40? I'm 30 and I
> don't think I am young  any more, certainly too old to join anything
> labelled 'youth-organisation'.  To me (and marketing organisations) the
> youth age group is  16-25.
>
> Aside from the free entry to every museum I have tried using it  in - a 
> very
> considerable benefit I admit - I have felt that ICOM has not  added 
> anything
> to my knowledge of museums/ the museum world. I hope this  can change.
>
> Rachel Cockett
> Birmingham,  UK
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> **
> *******************
> The  information contained within this e-mail (and any attachment) sent by
> Birmingham City Council is confidential and may be legally privileged. It 
> is
> intended only for the named recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. 
> If
> you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies and notify
> the
> sender immediately, or telephone +(44) 121 464 4444 Unauthorised access,
> use,
> disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted and may be unlawful. Any
> e-mail including its content may be monitored and used by Birmingham City
> Council
> for reasons of security and for monitoring internal compliance with  the
> office policy on staff use. E-mail blocking software may also be used. Any
> views
> or opinions presented are solely those of the originator and do not
> necessarily represent those of Birmingham City Council. We cannot 
> guarantee
> that this
> message or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted  and
> amended.
> ****************************************************************************
> **
> *******************
>
> -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Change  ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
> archives at:   http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html
>
>
>
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
> archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
> archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html
> 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2